Ada Kaitan Tak Dengan 1st. Artikel Hari ni?

Artikel ni aku cilok kat [sini]. macam ada sinambungan dengan artikel aku dekat [sini] & [sini].korang baca & tengok ada persamaan tak sikit-sikit?

Star online reports that Penang MCA deputy chairman Lau Chiek Tuan finds it quite unacceptable that Najib apologised for the remark by Bukit Bendera Umno division head Datuk Ahmad Ismail that the Chinese community are just immigrants in the country and therefore not entitled to equal rights in Malaysia.

“How can Najib apologise when he did not say such things?”, Lau is reported to have asked.

Sure, he did not say what Ahmad said.

Najib only threatened to spill the blood of the Chinese!

And I don’t recall any apology from him for that!

And why is he pretending remorse now?

That same Star online report has it that Ahmad made those remarks in the presence of Najib.

Why no rebuke for Ahmad the moment the remark was made? Why no spontaneous apology to those in the audience?

And did he truly apologise?

What did Najib say that is now said to be UMNO’s apology?

Star online reports that Najib hopes that ‘non-Malays will not be too disturbed’ with Ahmad’s remark

However, IF non-Malays are offended by the statement, on behalf of UMNO, then Najib apologises.

Therefore if non-Malays are not offended, no apology.

He only regrets the statement if non-Malays are offended.

What, does he imagine that Malays will not take offence?

A qualified apology only to non-Malays?

More divide and rule?

Reminiscent of the Najib-Lee Kim Sai wayang kulit of 1987, isn’t it?