"Mengikut Perjanjian itu, tiap-tiap Negeri akan menerima 5% daripada nilai petroliam yang dijumpai dan diperolehi dalam kawasan perairan atau di luar perairan Negeri tersebut yang dijual oleh PETRONAS atau ejensi-ejensi atau kontrektor-kontrektornya".- Tun Abdul Razak, Dewan Rakyat (12hb. November, 1975)
Monday, July 28, 2008
KONSPIRASI LIWAT 2!!! Doktor di Pusrawi pulak hilang
Pada 21 Julai, aku tulis tentang Konspirasi AG dan IGP. Dalam posting tu, aku ada tulis yang ni.
Sebenarnya, doktor tersebut ialah Dr. Mohamed Osman Abdul Hamid dari Hospital Pusrawi dan dia bersama seluruh anggota keluarganya telah bersembunyi kerana polis sedang mencari mereka dan mahukan doktor ini mengubah laporan perubatan yang dibuatnya.
Pada 2.00 petang, 28 June 2008, mohd. Saiful Bukhari Bin Azlan telah pergi menemui Dr. Mohamed Osman dan mengadu tentang kesakitan dibahagian dubur yang dialaminya. Saiful memberitahu doktor tersebut bahawa dia di "perkosa' oleh seorang yang sangat penting - maknanya, Anwar Ibrahim.
Dr. Mohamed Osman memeriksa Saiful tetapi mendapati tiada bukti bahawa dia diliwat, sama ada oleh Anwar Ibrahim ataupun sesiapa saja. Laporan doktor (boleh dilihat dibawah) mengatakan TIADA kesan luka pada kulit, TIADA pendarahan, TIADA kesan-kesan nanah dsb - secara asasnya bermakna tidak mungkin dia mengalami kesakitan diduburnya, seperti yang didakwa.
Pemeriksaan doktor menolak kemungkinan Saiful telah diliwat. Dengan lain perkataan, Mohd. Saiful Bukhari Bin Azlan tidak mengalami apa-apa kesakitan diduburnya, dan tidak juga diperkosa atau diliwat.
Saiful kemudiannya memberitahu bahawa dia mahu membuat laporan polis, lantas Dr. mohamed osman mencadangkan dia (Saiful) pergi untuk membuat pemeriksaan kedua dihospital kerajaan. Saiful kemudiannya pergi kehospital kerajaan dan doktor disitu juga mendapati perkara yang sama. Walaubagaimanapun, Saiful masih membuat laporan polis dipondok polis yang terdapat dihospital.
disebalik semua pengesahan doktor yang mengatakan Saiful tidak pernah diliwat, polis masih meneruskan kes ini. Anwar Ibrahim kemudiannya telah ditangkap oleh kira-kira 20 anggota UTK yang bersenjata dan memakai topeng dihadapan rumahnya walaupun dia telah bersetuju untuk melapur diri kebalai polis pada pukul 2.00 petang seperti yang dijanjikan.
Polis kemudiannya telah menahan Anwar didalam lokap sehingga keesokan harinya, malah telah dibawa kehospital untuk pemeriksaan dan mencuba untuk memperolehi sampel untuk tujuan profil DNA walaupun polis sudah pun mempunyai profil DAN Anwar pada tahun 1998 dan doktor-doktor dari dua buah hospital telah mengesahkan Saiful tidak diliwat.
Sudah jelas, kerajaan sedang mencuba untuk memalsukan bukti terhadap Anwar dan mencuba untuk membuktikan Anwar bersalah, melalui tuduhan liwat palsu.Dan siapakah dibelakang konspirasi ini, kalau bukan AG dan IGP, dua pelakon yang sama dengan konspirasi 1998.
Laporan doktor amat jelas. Saiful TIDAK pernah diliwat, sama ada oleh Anwar atau sesiapa pun. Mengapa kerajaan masih meneruskan kes ini terhadap Anwar? Dan mengapa mereka masih mencari doktor itu bersama keluarganya yang sekarang terpaksa bersembunyi?
Pertubuhan-pertubuhan masyarakat, NGO dan Majlis Peguam tidak seharusnya berdiam diri. Polis telah pun menahan doktor tersebut selama tiga hari tetapi masih enggan memalsukan laporannya. Anwar tidak meliwat saiful dan laporan doktor melaporkan dengan begitu jelas. dan polis juga mempunyai salinan laporan yang sama seperti yang disiarkan dibawah supaya mereka tahu apa yang aku tahu. Dan sekarang, rakyat Malaysia sudahpun mengetahui apa yang polis dan aku tahu.... iaitu Saiful tidak pernah diliwat oleh sesiapa pun.
(Posting ini adalah terjemahan kepada artikel yang dibuat oleh Raja Petra..Doctor on the run: police want him to fabricate evidence against Anwar )
-mat saman kati
Malaysia to try to stabilise falling palm oil prices: report
KUALA LUMPUR (AFP) — Malaysia will put in place a series of measures to stabilise plummeting global palm oil prices including selling off crude stocks, a report said Sunday.Peter Chin, minister of plantation industries and commodities, told the Sunday Star newspaper the government wanted to make sure that the almost 25-percent drop in prices in recent months did not become a long-term trend.
"The ministry expects palm oil to contribute up to 60 billion ringgit (19 billion dollars) in revenue to the country's coffers this year, but the substantial drop in the global price may upset this target," he said.
"We are worried this may be the start of a further decline in the price of palm oil and we will take counter-measures to maintain a good price," the newspaper quoted him as saying.
In the past week, palm oil prices fell to 3,095 ringgit per tonne from 3,500 ringgit. The price early this year was at 4,000 per tonne.
Chin said Malaysia will export crude -- not refined -- palm oil to China, India, Pakistan and the Middle East.
It will also increase exports to Western countries where palm oil can be used as bio-fuel during the upcoming northern hemisphere winter, he said.
Chin said other measures include increasing the usage of crude palm oil for bio-fuel production in Malaysia.
Oil palm cultivation occupies 67 percent of Malaysia's total agricultural land, and some 500,000 people are engaged in the sector. Malaysia hopes palm oil production will hit 20 million tonnes by 2020.
Anwar goes for Kulim Bandar Baharu
KULIM, July 28 — Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim is set to contest in the Kulim Bandar Baharu parliamentary by-election if an election court next month calls for one.
He has set his eyes on the Kulim Bandar Baru seat which is subject of an election petition judgment at the High Court's on Aug 19. The petition was made by Umno-Barisan Nasional candidate Datuk Abdul Aziz Sheikh Fadzir against winner Parti Keadilan Rakyat's Zulkifli Noordin.
The PKR de facto leader said he had consulted other Pakatan Rakyat leaders Pas president Datuk Seri Abdul Hadi Awang and DAP advisor Lim Kit Siang and they had promised to give him full support.
"I had my doubts about an hour ago but now, God willing, yes (I will contest here)," Anwar declared at about 11pm last night to thousands of a cheering multiracial crowd packing the Chinese Recreational Club here.
The night before in Kuala Lumpur, Anwar had said he was deciding between Kulim Bandar Baharu and Bandar Tun Razak in his attempt to enter Parliament — one more step in his political comeback since being freed from jail in 2004 on corruption and sodomy convictions.
Anwar addressing the crowd in the rally. — Picture by Adib Zalkapli
Of the voters, 34,667 or 67.93 per cent are Malays, Chinese 10,868 (21.13 per cent), Indians 5,907 (11.48 per cent) and others 2. The number of postal voters is 1,640.
In his petition, Umno's Abdul Aziz is asking the court to declare the results for the constituency null and void. He claimed that the PKR MP had failed to submit his statement of expenditure when he contested the Kuala Langat parliamentary seat in the previous general election in 2004.
The Election Act stipulates that candidates who failed to submit their statement of expenditure can be disqualified from contesting future elections.
Anwar told his supporters here that Zulkifli was the first PKR MP who had offered to make way for him to ensure his return to Parliament.
The crowd listening intently to what Anwar has to say. — Picture by Adib Zalkapli"He is an example of a young man who understands the meaning of struggle and willing to sacrifice for it," he added.
After his release, the former deputy prime minister was barred by law from active politics for five years, which ended in late April.
Anwar claimed the date for the last general election was intentionally set on March 8 to prevent him from contesting.
"But now my return to Parliament will pave the way for BN MPs to cross over to Pakatan Rakyat," he said.
He added his plan to return to Parliament would more than a political struggle. "It is about the dignity of the people and the future of the country."
Prepared to face what he claimed to be character assassination by his opponents, Anwar promised that he would not to resort to the same tactics.
He also expected BN to utilise the government machinery to defeat him in the by-election.
"I expect hundreds of millions of ringgit would be spent. But don't be fooled by election goodies. If they give money, just take it but vote for Pakatan Rakyat."
Anwar also promised to promote economic programmes based on open market.
"I promise that the economy will be better. And we will transform Malaysia into a new economic giant."
The Kulim ceramah is part of his roadshow since a male aide reported him for sodomy in late June, mirroring similar charges a decade ago that led to his sacking as deputy prime minister and finance minister.
Anwar has denied the accusations and has sued his accuser, 23-year-old Mohd Saiful Bukhari Azlan, for defamation and also slander in the Shariah court.
-TMI
Lastest Release.
Lastest Release.
In major music Retailers and C4 stores...
In major music Retailers and C4 stores...
Please buy and help it go platinum!! Why Has Anwar Not Been Charged?
I have been reading material that suggests that the publicity on the police report against Anwar Ibrahim is having an impact, even within the Pakatan Rakyat. It would seem that some in PAS are concerned enough to have allowed for discussions with UMNO to have become, or be seen to have become, more nuanced. Karim Raslan suggests that Anwar Ibrahim’s refusal to swear on the Quran is making enough people skeptical
I am not sure how correct this is. My sense, and I have written this elsewhere, is that enough people see the current events as being a politically driven, opportunistic or otherwise, initiative aimed at weakening Anwar Ibrahim and the Pakatan Rakyat.
With all of this and more, the burning question for me is why is it that much drama later - from the highly publicized police report by the alleged victim to Anwar seeking refuge with the Turkish Ambassador to his medical examination – Anwar Ibrahim has as yet to be charged?
Considering the extent of the insistence by the Government as to there having been a basis for all that has happened, most importantly the taking into custody of Anwar Ibrahim, and the tremendous publicity given to almost every dimension of the entire sordid affair, there would be enough for the Public Prosecutor (the Attorney General) to have preferred charges already.
That is what I would have done if I was the person making the decisions (I can fantasize, small pleasures). I would have charged Anwar Ibrahim and asked for an early trial of the matter seeing as how Anwar Ibrahim, and everything that happens to him, is very much in the public interest. I would then have marshaled the evidence and presented it during the prosecution stage of the case. That would have served all interests, legal and political.
So, why hasn’t it been done? Could it be there that there is not enough to go to court on? Is the investigation aimed more at fishing than it is at forming a basis for a reasoned decision, one way or the other? Or could it be that the trial is already underway in the court of public opinion.
Judging by topical commentary, that seems to be the case. Everyone is going to town, it would seem, on Anwar Ibrahim. And, as much as Anwar Ibrahim may not draw the support of some, that is not fair. He is entitled to judged by way of a fair trial and not by way of a media frenzy.
As things stand, Anwar Ibrahim is innocent. He was acquitted of the earlier charge of sodomy. In law there is no question of factual guilt as opposed to legal guilt. His acquittal means that he was not guilty and the prosecution did not prove its case, no matter what some might say. As for the current allegations, they remain just that: allegations. Anwar Ibrahim has not even been charged, how can any one of us form the view that he did anything. The law applies equally to all.
Now can we get back to thinking about running the country ?
-Disquiet
I am not sure how correct this is. My sense, and I have written this elsewhere, is that enough people see the current events as being a politically driven, opportunistic or otherwise, initiative aimed at weakening Anwar Ibrahim and the Pakatan Rakyat.
With all of this and more, the burning question for me is why is it that much drama later - from the highly publicized police report by the alleged victim to Anwar seeking refuge with the Turkish Ambassador to his medical examination – Anwar Ibrahim has as yet to be charged?
Considering the extent of the insistence by the Government as to there having been a basis for all that has happened, most importantly the taking into custody of Anwar Ibrahim, and the tremendous publicity given to almost every dimension of the entire sordid affair, there would be enough for the Public Prosecutor (the Attorney General) to have preferred charges already.
That is what I would have done if I was the person making the decisions (I can fantasize, small pleasures). I would have charged Anwar Ibrahim and asked for an early trial of the matter seeing as how Anwar Ibrahim, and everything that happens to him, is very much in the public interest. I would then have marshaled the evidence and presented it during the prosecution stage of the case. That would have served all interests, legal and political.
So, why hasn’t it been done? Could it be there that there is not enough to go to court on? Is the investigation aimed more at fishing than it is at forming a basis for a reasoned decision, one way or the other? Or could it be that the trial is already underway in the court of public opinion.
Judging by topical commentary, that seems to be the case. Everyone is going to town, it would seem, on Anwar Ibrahim. And, as much as Anwar Ibrahim may not draw the support of some, that is not fair. He is entitled to judged by way of a fair trial and not by way of a media frenzy.
As things stand, Anwar Ibrahim is innocent. He was acquitted of the earlier charge of sodomy. In law there is no question of factual guilt as opposed to legal guilt. His acquittal means that he was not guilty and the prosecution did not prove its case, no matter what some might say. As for the current allegations, they remain just that: allegations. Anwar Ibrahim has not even been charged, how can any one of us form the view that he did anything. The law applies equally to all.
Now can we get back to thinking about running the country ?
-Disquiet
Doctor on the run: police want him to fabricate evidence against Anwar
The doctor’s report says it very clearly. Saiful was never sodomised, either by Anwar or anyone else. Why is the government still pursuing the case against Anwar? And why are they looking for the doctor who has now gone underground with his whole family? NO HOLDS BARRED Raja Petra Kamarudin On 21 July 2008, I published an article in this same column called HOW, YET AGAIN, THEY ARE TRYING TO FABRICATE EVIDENCE AGAINST ANWAR. (Read the article here ).
In that article I mentioned as follows:
You see, they asked a certain doctor from a certain hospital to conduct an examination on Saiful. The doctor did so and he came out with a report that said there is no evidence Anwar had ever penetrated or sodomised the young man. The police then picked up the doctor and detained him for three days. As much as they tried to force him to change his report to implicate Anwar he refused to do so.
Until today, the doctor stands by his report that there is no evidence Anwar had sodomised Saiful. He knows he is going to be made to pay for this but he doesn’t care. He is not going to change his report and say that Anwar sodomised Saiful whatever they do to him. Exasperated, the police had to release Anwar on personal bond or police bail. The doctor refuses to doctor his report and neither does Anwar want to volunteer his new specimen.
Well, that doctor’s name is Dr Mohamed Osman Abdul Hamid from the Hospital Pusrawi and he has now taken his entire family and has gone into hiding because the police are looking for him and they want him to change his medical report.
At 2.00pm on 28 June 2008, Mohd Saiful Bukhari Bin Azlan went to see Dr Mohamed Osman to complain about a pain he is suffering in his anus. Saiful told the doctor that he had been assaulted by ‘a very important person’ -- meaning, of course, sodomised by Anwar Ibrahim.
Dr Mohamed Osman examined Saiful but found no evidence that he had been sodomised, either by Anwar Ibrahim or anyone else for that matter. The doctor’s report (which can be viewed below) says that there is zero (0) skin tearing, zero (0) active bleeding, zero (0) traces of pus, etc., which basically means he can’t be suffering from a pain in the anus as what he alleges.
The doctor’s diagnosis is that he rules out or TRO (to rule out) assault (sodomised). In short: Mohd Saiful Bukhari Bin Azlan is not suffering any pain in the anus and neither was he assaulted or sodomised in the anus.
Saiful then said he would like to make a police report so Dr Mohamed Osman suggested he go for a second medical examination at a government hospital. Saiful did so and the doctor at the government hospital also came out with the same diagnosis. Nevertheless, Saiful still made his police report at the pondok police in the hospital.
In spite of the doctors all confirming that Saiful was never sodomised, the police still pursued the case. Anwar Ibrahim was subsequently arrested by about 20 SWAT members in Balaclavas and armed to the teeth in a dramatic movie-style action-packed drama in front of his house after he had confirmed he would be reporting to the police station at 2.00pm as required.
The police detained Anwar in the lockup until the next morning and even brought him to the hospital for examination and to try to obtain his specimen for what the police say are for purposes of doing a DNA profile. The fact that the police already have Anwar’s DNA profile from 1998, plus the doctors from both hospitals confirm that Saiful was never sodomised, did not seem to matter.
Clearly the government is attempting to fabricate evidence against Anwar and is trying to indict him on trumped-up charges of sodomy. And who but the slime-ball AG and scumbag IGP, the same two players in the 1998 episode, can be behind this latest travesty of justice.
The doctor’s report says it very clearly. Saiful was never sodomised, either by Anwar or anyone else. Why is the government still pursuing the case against Anwar? And why are they looking for the doctor who has now gone underground with his whole family?
Civil society movements, NGOs and the Malaysian Bar Council must not remain silent. The police have already detained the doctor for three days but he still refuses to doctor his medical report. Anwar did not sodomise Saiful and the doctor’s report says it very clearly. And the police also have a copy of this same report that I have published below so they know what I know. And now Malaysians also already know what I and the police know -- that Saiful was never sodomised by anyone.
ADDENDUMS
(Go to http://w1.malaysia-today.net/content/view/10433/1/ to see images)
Mahathir Mengaku Wujudnya Konspirasi Pada 1998
Ada satu perenggan dalam artikel terkini mantan Perdana Menteri Mahathir Mohamad mengenai kontroversi sodomi Anwar yang nampaknya memberikan gambaran kepada pemikiran bawah-sedar Mahathir mengenai perkara itu.
Dalam artikel berjudul “Debat Anwar’ yang disiarkan dalam blog beliau pada 17 Julai, Mahathir telah mencadangkan betapa dakwaan sodomi (liwat) terbaru terhadap Anwar Ibrahim mungkin betul, kerana kerajaan tidak mungkin begitu bodoh menggunakan taktik yang sama dua kali untuk menyusahkan Anwar. Beberapa bahagian yang menarik dalam hujah beliau terdapat dalam perenggan 6 & 7 dan saya petik hujah berikut:
- Para 6: Namun, apakah mungkin kerajaan yang ada ini begitu bodoh dan tidak berimaginasi menggunakan ‘taktik’ yang sama khususnya setelah kerajaan sendiri bersuka hati dengan pembebasan Anwar? Tentu ia mampu mencipta satu lagi cerita yang masuk akal kalau pun ia mahu merencana dengan niat ataupun berkonspirasi terhadap Anwar. Keberangkaliannya kisah itu sama kerana ia memang benar.
Para 7: apa pengadu yang baru ini seorang (copycat) tiruan. Besar kemungkinan, tidak. “Tidak ramai yang berani mengumumkan perkara yang amat memalukan itu, sebagai sudah kena liwat.....”
Perkataan ‘copycat’ mengandaikan bahawa ada seseorang yang mengada-adakan sesuatu dengan cara meniru perkara lama. Jadi apakah makna ‘sesuatu’ yang sedang ditiru? Apakah ianya tuduhan sodomi sahaja ataupun satu helah untuk mengenakan Anwar? Sudah tentu ia mengenai perkara yang terakhir tadi, kerana tidak masuk akal untuk seseorang menuduh Anwar meliwatnya hanya dengan meniru tuduhan yang serupa sepuluh tahun dahulu. Jadi dengan menggunakan perkataan ‘copycat’ untuk menjelaskan soalannya, apakah Mahathir tidak secara tak sengaja mendedahkan fikiran bawah-sedarnya bahawa kejadian yang dulu itu sesungguhnya satu konspirasi?
Trenda pemikiran yang sama boleh juga di kesan dalam penggunaan perkataan ‘taktik yang sama’ untuk membayangkan kejadian yang baru ini.
walaupun perkataan taktik itu difahami sebagai satu perkataan yang menyindir. Kalaulah kejadian yang dahulu itu bukan satu konspirasi kenapa pula gunakannya untuk membayangkan bahawa kejadian terbaru ini bukan satu konspirasi? Dengan berbuat demikian Mahathir sesungguhnya berkata bahawa orang tidak akan sebodoh itu menggunakan trik yang sama ke atas orang yang sama. Apakah ini satu pengakuan bahawa tuduhan sodomi pada 1998 adalah satu konspirasi terhadap Anwar?
Mahathir semacam membuat pengakuan bahawa tuduhan sodomi 1998 dahulu bukanlah satu tindakan bijak apabila beliau berkata” sudah tentu mereka boleh cipta satu cerita baru yang lebih masuk akal....”
Walaupun perbicaraan 1998/1999 terhadap Anwar telah diikhtiraf secara global sebagai konspirasi untuk menghancurkan kerjaya politik Anwar, inilah buat pertama kali Mahathir membuat pengakuan dengan perkataan dia sendiri, betapa pun dia tidak berniat demikian.
Mengenai hujah utama Mahathir bahawa tidak mungkin kerajaan yang ada ini begitu bodoh, jawapannya mudah sahaja: Ini bukannya rencana kerajaan tetapi satu helah kesyaitanan yang dilakar oleh segelintir manusia yang begitu berpengaruh yang merasa diri terancam oleh kemungkinan naiknya Anwar ke persada politik negara.
Apakah tindakan ini memang bodoh seperti yang didakwa oleh Mahathir? Tentu tidak! Sebaliknya tuduhan sodomi masih kekal sebagai senjata yang paling mudah dan perkasa untuk menjatuhkan seorang tokoh dalam sebuah negara seperti Malaysia di mana hukum undang-undang adalah terlalu lemah dan perilaku seksual dikutuk secara mudah sebagai satu jenayah besar. Yang penting, institusi negara yang korup yang bertanggungjawab menjatuhkan Anwar sepuluh tahun dahulu masih kekal korup hingga hari ini.
Apakah Anwar bersalah kerana meliwat seperti yang didakwa oleh Mahathir? Jawapannya begini: Bolehkah polis membebaskan Anwar hanya beberapa jam selepas menangkap beliau dengan segala hiruk-pikuk; dan seandainya Anwar tidak memberikan alibi yang menyelamatkan dirinya pada hari dikatakan telah meliwat si pengadu?
27.07.2008 - Terjemahan marhaintua (MT-SPAR)
(suntingan M@RHAEN - Emel: marhaen@gmail.com/ reformasi@gmail.com)
Anwar decides to contest in Kulim Bandar Baru
KULIM, July 27 — Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim is set to contest in Kulim Bandar Baharu parliamentary by-election.
He has set his eyes on the Kulim Bandar Baru seat which is pending on an election court's decision on Aug 19 to decide whether there is a need for a by-election. The petition was made by Umno-Barisan Nasional candidate Datuk Abdul Aziz Sheikh Fadzir against winner PKR's Zulkifli Noordin.
The Parti Keadilan Rakyat de facto leader said he had consulted other Pakatan Rakyat leaders Pas president Datuk Seri Abdul Hadi Awang and DAP advisor Lim Kit Siang and they had promised to give him full support.
"I have my doubt about an hour ago but now, God willing, yes (I will contest here)," he declared to thousands of his cheering multiracial crowd who packed the hall at the Chinese Recreational Club here in Kedah.
The night before in Kuala Lumpur Anwar had said he was mulling between Kulim and Bandar Tun Razak in his attempt to make an official political comeback.
MORE TO FOLLOW
-TMIArroyo sends officials to salvage peace talks with MILF
This summary is not available. Please
click here to view the post.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)